One month into the First Balkan War and the Momentum of the War appears to be completely on the side of the Balkan League, as they march towards Istanbul. An account, published in the New York Times, also demonstrates the role of the Great Powers in this war, and wars to come.
Difficult Questions Now
Up.
Special
Cable to THE NEW YORK TIMES
London, Saturday,
Nov 9. – With Salonika fallen to the Greeks, Adrianople almost fallen, and the
Bulgarian attack upon Tchatalja lines progressing favorably, the Balkan war in
the full sense of the word is practically over. There now remains only the
settlement of the questions which the war has raised.
The difficulties of
that settlement are now bulking greater than ever. Bulgaria officially
declared, in a communiqué issued in London yesterday, that her army must enter Constantinople
in order to obtain a stable and lasting peace, but not remain there. This the
question of the ultimate ownership of Constantinople is left open to the
possible solution by what undoubtedly is the easiest course at present within
the power of European diplomacy, namely, that of leaving the peninsula on which
Stamboul stands as a last remnant of the Ottoman dominion in Europe.
This is the most
favorable aspect of the diplomatic situation that the news of the past
twenty-four hours presents. The most unfavorable feature is the approaching
crisis in the relations of Austria and Servia. The news of Austria’s attitude
cabled to the New York Times’s Vienna correspondent to-day:
Austria is
absolutely determined not to allow Servia to occupy an Adriatic port, even at
the risk of Servia’s being supported by Russia.
The Austrian view is fully supported by Germany and Italy.
Austria Suspicious of Russia.
Austria offers Servia a seaport on the
Aegean. Servia shows every sign of persisting in her ambition for an outlet on
the Adriatic. In Vienna there exists a strong suspicion that she is being
encouraged by Russia, and although a London news agency yesterday circulated a
report to the effect that the powers of the Triple Entente had notified Servia
that while felling the warmest sympathy with her in her desire for an Asiatic
port, they hoped she would consent to submit the matter to international
decision in the interests of European peace, this morning’s Times denies that
Russian, France and England have yet taken up any definite position on the
question. The situation thus seems to be one of extreme delicacy and
difficulty.
The serious view
taken of the international outlook may be gauged by a leader in this morning’s
Telegraph, which says:
“At the end of the
week of such anxiety as the diplomacy of Europe has not known in many years it
is our duty to say that the situation in the Near East gives more ground for apprehension
than has existed at any time since the opening of the war.”
No comments:
Post a Comment